Moving beyond generic training checklists is crucial for achieving tangible results. A well-crafted learning plan acts as a strategic roadmap, guiding learners from initial knowledge to genuine mastery and measurable impact. It’s the difference between hoping for improvement and engineering it with precision and purpose. Think of it as the architectural blueprint for education; without one, you're building on an unstable foundation.
This structured approach ensures every module, activity, and assessment is aligned with a specific, measurable outcome. Just as a detailed mobile app development roadmap guides a project from concept to launch, a learning plan provides a clear path for skill acquisition. It transforms abstract training goals into an actionable sequence of steps, making the entire process more efficient, transparent, and effective for both trainers and learners.
This article unpacks six powerful and proven learning plan samples, providing not just a template, but a deep dive into the strategic thinking behind each one. We'll analyse why specific frameworks are chosen for certain scenarios and break down their core components. You will get more than just examples; you will get a strategic guide to selecting, customising, and implementing the right plan for your needs. Whether you're in corporate L&D, an academic institution, or designing individualised training, these frameworks will help you build learning experiences that deliver real, lasting change.
1. Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation Learning Plan
The Kirkpatrick Model is a globally recognised method for evaluating the results of training and learning programs. It provides a comprehensive framework that moves beyond learner satisfaction to assess the real-world impact of training. This model is one of the most powerful learning plan samples because it structures the entire process around measurable outcomes.
Developed by Donald Kirkpatrick in the 1950s, the model organises evaluation into four distinct levels: Reaction, Learning, Behaviour, and Results. By building your learning plan with these four levels in mind from the outset, you ensure that every training objective is directly tied to a tangible business outcome. This approach forces a focus on "why" the training is needed and "what" success will look like, making it invaluable for demonstrating ROI.
Strategic Breakdown of the Kirkpatrick Model
The power of this model lies in its sequential and layered approach. Each level builds upon the information gathered from the previous one, creating a comprehensive picture of training effectiveness.
Level 1: Reaction. This initial stage measures how participants felt about the training. Did they find it engaging, relevant, and well-delivered? This is typically measured with post-training surveys or feedback forms.
Level 2: Learning. Here, you assess the extent to which participants acquired the intended knowledge, skills, and attitudes. This is evaluated through quizzes, skills-based assessments, or pre- and post-training tests.
Level 3: Behaviour. This level examines whether participants are applying what they learned on the job. It requires observation, performance reviews, and feedback from managers to determine if new skills have been transferred to the workplace.
Level 4: Results. The final level measures the direct impact of the training on business outcomes. This could include increased productivity, higher sales figures, improved quality, or lower employee turnover.
Companies like IBM and General Electric have famously used this model to evaluate their leadership and management training programs, ensuring their significant investments in development translate into measurable organisational improvements.
The following infographic illustrates the progressive flow of evaluation from immediate participant feedback to long-term behavioural change.
This visual process flow highlights that each evaluation stage is a prerequisite for the next, showing how learning effectiveness is measured in progressive steps from initial satisfaction to on-the-job application.
Actionable Takeaways for Implementation
To effectively integrate this model into your learning plan, consider these practical tips:
Begin with the End in Mind: Start at Level 4 (Results). Define the desired business outcomes first, then work backwards to determine the necessary behaviours (Level 3), learning objectives (Level 2), and engaging experiences (Level 1) needed to achieve them.
Establish a Baseline: Before the training begins, collect baseline data for the metrics you intend to measure. This is crucial for demonstrating a clear "before and after" impact, especially for Level 3 and Level 4 evaluations.
Use a Mixed-Method Approach: Don't rely on a single data source. Combine surveys, quizzes, direct observation, performance metrics, and 360-degree feedback to create a well-rounded evaluation at each level.
Allow Time for Change: Be patient. The transition from Learning (Level 2) to Behaviour (Level 3) doesn't happen overnight. Schedule follow-up evaluations several weeks or months after the training to accurately measure behavioural change.
2. Bloom's Taxonomy-Based Learning Plan
Bloom's Taxonomy provides a powerful framework for classifying educational learning objectives into levels of complexity and specificity. It organises learning into a hierarchy, ensuring that learners build a solid foundation of knowledge before moving on to more advanced, higher-order thinking skills. This model is one of the most effective learning plan samples for creating a comprehensive and scaffolded educational experience.
Originally developed by Benjamin Bloom in 1956 and later revised, the taxonomy progresses through six cognitive levels: Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyse, Evaluate, and Create. Structuring a learning plan around this progression ensures a logical flow from foundational knowledge to sophisticated application. This deliberate structure helps instructional designers create targeted activities and assessments that precisely match the desired level of cognitive skill, preventing gaps in learning.
Strategic Breakdown of Bloom's Taxonomy
The strength of this model is its hierarchical nature, where mastery of each level is a prerequisite for the next. This layered approach guarantees a deep and robust understanding rather than superficial knowledge.
Remember: This foundational level focuses on recalling facts and basic concepts. Activities include memorising definitions, listing key points, or repeating information.
Understand: Learners explain ideas or concepts. This involves summarising information in their own words, classifying items, or discussing a topic's main idea.
Apply: Here, learners use the information they have learned in new situations. This could mean solving a problem, implementing a procedure, or demonstrating a skill.
Analyse: This level involves breaking down information into its constituent parts to explore relationships. Learners might compare and contrast ideas, deconstruct an argument, or organise data.
Evaluate: Learners justify a stand or decision. This includes critiquing an argument, assessing the value of a theory, or defending a particular viewpoint.
Create: The highest level involves generating new ideas, products, or ways of viewing things. Activities include designing a project, composing a piece of work, or formulating a new hypothesis.
Khan Academy’s curriculum is a prime example of this model in action. Learners must first master basic concepts (Remember, Understand) through videos and practice problems before they can tackle more complex, multi-step challenges (Apply, Analyse).
This infographic shows the hierarchical structure of Bloom's Taxonomy, illustrating the progression from foundational knowledge to higher-order thinking skills.
This visual representation underscores how each cognitive level builds upon the last, forming a complete pyramid of learning that culminates in the ability to create new knowledge.
Actionable Takeaways for Implementation
To effectively build a learning plan using Bloom's Taxonomy, consider these practical strategies:
Use Action Verbs: Start each learning objective with a verb that corresponds to a specific level of the taxonomy. For example, use "define" or "list" for Remember, "explain" for Understand, and "design" or "formulate" for Create.
Align Assessments to Objectives: Ensure your assessments directly measure the cognitive skill targeted by your objective. A multiple-choice quiz might be perfect for the "Remember" level, while a case study analysis is better suited for "Analyse" or "Evaluate."
Scaffold Learning Activities: Design your curriculum to guide learners progressively up the pyramid. Begin with content that builds foundational knowledge before introducing activities that require critical thinking and problem-solving.
Incorporate Real-World Projects: At the higher levels (Analyse, Evaluate, Create), use project-based learning and real-world scenarios. This challenges learners to apply their comprehensive knowledge in practical, meaningful ways, solidifying their understanding.
3. 70-20-10 Development Learning Plan
The 70-20-10 model is a strategic framework for organisational learning and development that champions experience-driven growth. It posits that individuals obtain 70% of their knowledge from job-related experiences, 20% from interactions with others, and only 10% from formal educational events. This model is one of the most effective learning plan samples because it shifts the focus from traditional classroom training to a more holistic, integrated, and continuous development cycle.
Popularised by the Centre for Creative Leadership, this framework helps organisations build learning cultures that value hands-on practice, collaborative problem-solving, and targeted formal education. By structuring development around this ratio, learning plans become less about isolated training events and more about creating a rich ecosystem where employees learn naturally within their workflow. This approach ensures development is practical, relevant, and directly tied to an individual's role and career progression.
This visual breakdown emphasizes that the majority of impactful learning happens through hands-on experience, supported by social interaction and reinforced by formal instruction, creating a powerful blend of development activities.
Strategic Breakdown of the 70-20-10 Model
The model's strength is its ability to create well-rounded professionals by blending different learning modalities. Each component serves a distinct yet interconnected purpose, fostering comprehensive skill development.
70%: Experiential Learning. This is the core of the model. It includes on-the-job challenges, stretch assignments, special projects, and problem-solving tasks. The learning is organic, contextual, and deeply embedded in the employee's daily responsibilities.
20%: Social Learning. This component focuses on learning through others. It encompasses coaching, mentoring, peer-to-peer feedback, and collaborative work. These interactions provide guidance, different perspectives, and crucial support.
10%: Formal Learning. This represents structured, traditional training methods. It includes workshops, seminars, e-learning courses, and professional certifications. While the smallest component, it is vital for providing foundational knowledge and theoretical frameworks.
Companies like Google and Deloitte have successfully integrated the 70-20-10 model into their leadership and employee development initiatives. They use it to ensure that learning is not just an event but a continuous process woven into the fabric of daily work, driving both innovation and performance.
Actionable Takeaways for Implementation
To build a learning plan based on the 70-20-10 model, focus on creating a balanced and integrated experience:
Prioritise Experience: Design roles and projects that intentionally stretch employees' capabilities. Align these challenging assignments with specific development goals to ensure the experience is purposeful and developmental.
Facilitate Connections: Establish formal mentoring programs and create communities of practice. Encourage managers to provide regular coaching and constructive feedback, making social learning a deliberate part of the culture.
Be Strategic with Formal Training: Use the 10% for targeted interventions that directly support the experiential and social components. Select courses that provide the necessary knowledge to succeed in a new project or role.
Promote Reflection: Encourage employees to regularly reflect on their experiences and what they have learned. Incorporate guided questions or journaling into the process to help them connect the dots between all three learning areas.
For a deeper dive into structuring these types of plans, explore these actionable employee development plan examples.
4. Individual Education Program (IEP) Learning Plan
The Individual Education Program (IEP) is a highly structured, legally mandated learning plan developed for students with disabilities in the public school system. It is a collaborative document created by a team of parents, teachers, specialists, and, when appropriate, the student. This plan serves as a critical roadmap, detailing the unique educational needs of a student and outlining the specialized instruction, supports, and services required for them to make meaningful academic progress.
The IEP is one of the most personalized learning plan samples available, as it is built entirely around an individual student's present performance, strengths, and challenges. Its legal foundation under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) ensures a focus on providing a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) in the least restrictive environment. The core purpose is to set ambitious yet achievable annual goals and align all resources to help the student meet those goals.
Strategic Breakdown of the IEP Model
The power of the IEP lies in its comprehensive and cyclical nature. It is not a static document but a living plan that is regularly reviewed and revised to reflect the student's progress and changing needs.
Present Levels of Performance (PLOP): This is the foundation of the IEP. It describes the student's current academic achievement and functional performance, including how their disability affects their involvement and progress in the general education curriculum.
Annual Goals: Based on the PLOP, the team develops specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals for the student to work on over the next year. These goals target specific areas of need identified in the evaluation.
Specialized Instruction and Services: This section details the specific special education and related services the school will provide. This could include speech therapy, occupational therapy, specialized academic instruction, or counselling services.
Accommodations and Modifications: The plan outlines necessary accommodations (changes to how a student learns, like extended time on tests) and modifications (changes to what a student is expected to learn) to ensure access to the curriculum.
Progress Monitoring: A critical component is the description of how the student's progress toward their annual goals will be measured and how parents will be regularly informed of that progress.
This framework is used extensively in public school districts to create support programs for students with a wide range of needs, from autism support programs to transition planning for students with intellectual disabilities preparing for post-secondary life.
Actionable Takeaways for Implementation
While designed for the K-12 educational system, the principles of the IEP can be adapted for personalized development plans in any setting.
Focus on Strengths-Based Goal Setting: While an IEP addresses areas of need, frame goals around the individual's strengths. A strengths-based approach is more motivating and builds confidence, leading to better outcomes.
Ensure Goals are Truly Measurable: Vague goals like "improve reading skills" are ineffective. Instead, create precise goals like, "By the end of the second semester, the student will be able to read a grade-level passage at 90 words per minute with 95% accuracy."
Involve the Learner in the Process: Whenever age-appropriate, include the student in the goal-setting and planning process. This fosters self-advocacy and ownership over their learning journey, which is a critical life skill.
Establish a Clear Communication Cadence: The IEP mandates regular progress reports. In any learning plan, establish a consistent schedule for communication among all stakeholders (learner, manager, mentor, instructor) to discuss progress, address challenges, and celebrate successes.
5. Competency-Based Learning Plan
A Competency-Based Learning Plan shifts the focus from time spent in a course to the mastery of specific, measurable skills. This educational model allows learners to progress at their own pace, advancing only after they have demonstrated proficiency in a given competency. This approach is one of the most effective learning plan samples for roles where specific, demonstrable skills are more important than traditional academic credentials.
Popularised by institutions like Western Governors University and organisations like the Competency-Based Education Network, this model prioritises what a learner can do over how long they have studied. The learning plan is structured around a clear set of competencies tied directly to real-world job requirements or academic standards. This ensures that every piece of learning is relevant and applicable, making it a powerful tool for closing skills gaps and preparing a workforce for specific challenges.
Strategic Breakdown of the Competency-Based Model
The strength of this model is its flexibility and sharp focus on outcomes. It dismantles the one-size-fits-all approach, allowing for personalised learning journeys that respect the individual's prior knowledge and learning speed.
Define Competencies: The foundation of the plan is a well-defined set of competencies. These are the specific knowledge, skills, and abilities a learner must master. Each competency is broken down into observable and measurable behaviours.
Design Authentic Assessments: Instead of traditional tests, this model uses authentic assessments. Learners demonstrate mastery by completing projects, simulations, or real-world tasks that mirror what they would do on the job.
Provide Flexible Learning Pathways: Learners are given access to a variety of resources-such as readings, videos, and mentor support-but are free to use them as needed. If they can already demonstrate a competency, they can bypass the instructional material and move directly to the assessment.
Enable Self-Paced Progression: Progress is not tied to a calendar. Learners advance to the next module or competency as soon as they have proven mastery of the current one, allowing for accelerated learning paths.
Companies like IBM leverage this model with their SkillsBuild platform, which offers credentials based on demonstrated technical competencies. This allows them to quickly upskill their workforce and new talent in high-demand areas like artificial intelligence and cybersecurity.
Actionable Takeaways for Implementation
To build a successful competency-based learning plan, a shift in mindset from "teaching" to "verifying mastery" is essential.
Define Competencies with Precision: Work with subject matter experts and industry leaders to define each competency in clear, observable terms. A competency like "effective communication" is too vague; break it down into measurable skills like "delivers a persuasive presentation" or "writes a clear technical brief".
Develop Multiple Pathways to Mastery: Recognise that learners have different backgrounds and learning styles. Provide a rich library of resources and allow them to choose their path. Offer various assessment options, such as a project, a portfolio submission, or a skill demonstration.
Build a Robust Support System: Self-paced learning does not mean learning alone. A strong support structure is crucial. This includes access to mentors, coaches, or instructors who can provide guidance, feedback, and encouragement when a learner gets stuck.
Create a Portfolio System: Implement a system, often digital, where learners can collect and showcase evidence of their mastered competencies. This portfolio becomes a powerful tool for career advancement, demonstrating tangible skills to current and future employers.
6. ADDIE Model Learning Plan
The ADDIE Model is a systematic instructional design framework that provides a structured, step-by-step process for building effective training and performance support tools. As one of the most foundational learning plan samples, it guides developers through five distinct yet interconnected phases: Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. Its cyclical nature ensures that each phase informs the next, creating a logical and thorough approach to instructional design.
Originally developed by Florida State University for the U.S. military, the ADDIE framework’s strength lies in its meticulous and goal-oriented structure. It forces instructional designers to conduct a thorough analysis before any content is created, ensuring the final learning solution directly addresses the identified needs and performance gaps. This front-loaded approach prevents wasted resources and results in a more targeted and effective learning experience.
Strategic Breakdown of the ADDIE Model
The power of this model comes from its logical progression, ensuring no critical step is missed in the creation of a learning program. Each phase has a clear purpose and delivers an output that serves as the input for the next phase.
Analysis. This is the foundational phase where you identify the learning problem, the goals and objectives, the audience's needs, and existing knowledge. Key questions include: Who needs the training? What do they need to learn? What are the business constraints?
Design. In this phase, you create the blueprint for the learning experience. It involves writing learning objectives, selecting instructional strategies, outlining the content flow, and choosing assessment methods. This is where the overall structure and feel of the program are determined.
Development. This is the content creation phase where the blueprints from the Design phase are brought to life. Instructional designers develop course materials, programmers build e-learning modules, and graphic designers create visuals.
Implementation. Here, the developed program is delivered to the target audience. This phase involves preparing facilitators, arranging logistics for learners, and launching the training platform or classroom sessions.
Evaluation. The final phase measures the effectiveness of the training. This step runs throughout the entire process (formative evaluation) and after implementation (summative evaluation) to determine if the goals were met and what improvements are needed.
The model's robust structure has made it a staple for large-scale projects, including corporate e-learning module creation for compliance training and the comprehensive design of university courses.
Actionable Takeaways for Implementation
To use the ADDIE model effectively, focus on the integrity of each phase while allowing for flexibility and iteration.
Front-Load Your Efforts: Dedicate significant time and resources to the Analysis phase. A thorough upfront analysis prevents costly revisions later and ensures the entire project is aligned with genuine organisational needs.
Prototype During Development: Use rapid prototyping or create a minimum viable product (MVP) during the Development phase. This allows you to test concepts with stakeholders and a small group of learners early on, gathering valuable feedback before full-scale development.
Maintain Stakeholder Involvement: Don't wait until the end to get feedback. Involve key stakeholders in review processes at the end of each phase. This ensures continuous buy-in and helps catch misalignments early. This process is a crucial part of creating a detailed program, similar to what you'd see in an example of a lesson plan.
Embrace Formative Evaluation: Don't treat Evaluation as just a final step. Conduct formative evaluations throughout the Analysis, Design, and Development phases to continuously refine your approach and improve the quality of the final product.
Learning Plan Models Comparison
Learning Plan Model | Implementation Complexity 🔄 | Resource Requirements ⚡ | Expected Outcomes 📊 | Ideal Use Cases 💡 | Key Advantages ⭐ |
Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation | High – multi-level evaluation with data collection | High – requires tools for quantitative and qualitative data | Clear ROI measurement and business impact tracking | Corporate training evaluation, leadership development | Systematic, recognized framework with progressive metrics |
Bloom's Taxonomy-Based Learning Plan | Moderate – structured progression through cognitive levels | Moderate – varied assessments and learning activity design | Comprehensive cognitive skill development | Education, curriculum design, assessment development | Clear cognitive hierarchy and wide applicability |
70-20-10 Development Learning Plan | Moderate – integrating experiential, social, and formal learning | Moderate – organizational support and mentorship needed | Enhanced practical skills and continuous learning | Workplace learning, leadership development programs | Practical, cost-effective with strong social learning focus |
Individual Education Program (IEP) | High – personalized, multidisciplinary collaboration | High – involves legal compliance, monitoring, and review | Tailored educational goals with legal safeguards | Special education, students with disabilities | Personalized, legally mandated with accountability |
Competency-Based Learning Plan | High – redesigns curriculum and assessment methods | High – requires teacher training and flexible systems | Mastery-based progression with real-world skill validation | K-12, higher education, workforce development | Personalized mastery focus aligned with workforce needs |
ADDIE Model Learning Plan | High – five sequential, iterative design phases | High – comprehensive design, development, and evaluation | Well-aligned, quality instructional materials | Instructional design, e-learning, corporate and military training | Structured, iterative with quality control checkpoints |
From Plan to Performance: Activating Your Learning Strategy
We have journeyed through a diverse collection of powerful frameworks, from the outcome-focused rigour of Kirkpatrick's model to the holistic, experience-based structure of the 70-20-10 plan. Each of these learning plan samples offers a unique lens through which to view development, providing a strategic blueprint for translating educational goals into tangible results. The true power, however, lies not in choosing one definitive template but in understanding the core principles behind each one.
The detailed breakdowns of the ADDIE model, Bloom's Taxonomy, and Competency-Based plans reveal a common thread: successful learning is intentional, structured, and measurable. It moves beyond simply delivering information and instead focuses on building skills, changing behaviours, and driving performance. Your role is to act as an architect, selecting and combining the strongest elements from these models to construct a learning experience perfectly suited to your specific needs.
Synthesizing the Models for Maximum Impact
The most innovative learning strategies often arise from a hybrid approach. Imagine integrating the granular, skill-focused objectives of a Competency-Based plan with the structured, iterative development process of the ADDIE model. This combination ensures that every phase of course design, from analysis to evaluation, is laser-focused on developing specific, measurable proficiencies.
Similarly, you could overlay the 70-20-10 framework onto an Individual Education Program (IEP). While the IEP defines the "what" (the specific learning goals for an individual), the 70-20-10 model provides the "how" by suggesting a balanced mix of on-the-job experience, social learning, and formal instruction to achieve those goals.
Strategic Insight: The most effective learning plan is not a rigid document but a dynamic and adaptable guide. Treat these samples as a toolkit, not a set of prescriptive rules. The goal is to blend methodologies to create a customised solution that addresses your unique challenges and learner demographics.
Activating Your Plan: From Document to Delivery
With a customised plan in hand, the focus shifts to execution. This transition from strategy to action requires careful coordination, resource allocation, and clear communication. A well-designed plan can falter if its implementation is chaotic or poorly managed.
To maintain clarity and momentum, many training and development teams adopt project management principles. Visualising the entire implementation process, from content creation to final evaluation, is crucial for keeping stakeholders aligned and tasks on schedule. For complex initiatives involving multiple contributors, understanding concepts like Kanban board project management can provide an invaluable framework. This visual approach helps teams track progress, identify bottlenecks, and manage workflows with greater efficiency, ensuring your meticulously crafted learning plan is delivered flawlessly.
Final Takeaways for Your Learning Strategy
As you move forward, keep these core principles at the forefront of your planning:
Start with the End in Mind: Always begin by defining the desired outcome. Whether it's improved job performance, mastery of a new skill, or a specific behavioural change, a clear destination makes the journey much easier to map. This is the central lesson from models like Kirkpatrick's.
Know Your Audience: The needs, existing knowledge, and learning preferences of your audience should dictate the structure, content, and delivery methods you choose. An IEP is the ultimate example of this principle in action.
Embrace Continuous Improvement: Learning is not a one-time event. Build feedback loops and evaluation checkpoints into your plan, as exemplified by the ADDIE model. Use the data you gather to refine and enhance future training initiatives.
Ultimately, the learning plan samples explored in this article are more than just templates; they are strategic frameworks for fostering growth and achieving organisational excellence. By thoughtfully adapting and implementing them, you can create powerful learning experiences that not only educate but also inspire and transform.
Ready to move from planning to creation faster than ever? Learniverse uses AI to instantly generate entire courses from your existing documents, videos, or web links, helping you bring any learning plan to life in minutes. Turn your strategic framework into engaging, ready-to-deploy training content with Learniverse.